A Week in the War: Afghanistan, March 24-30, 2010 | STRATFOR

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

How can we possibly win, when we telegraph our moves?

http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/20100330_week_war_afghanistan_march_2430_2010<br/>
With its population-centric approach, the United States obviously wants to avoid destructive urban battles like the twin 2004 battles of Fallujah in Iraq. But by announcing its planned Afghan offensives, the United States sacrifices the ability to trap key Taliban leaders and hard-line fighters. Some do stay and fight, but tipping the Taliban off gives them a great deal of freedom of action in terms of choosing how, when and where they will continue the battle. And the Taliban continue to demonstrate their skill in classic guerilla warfare, resisting and wearing down their opponent without allowing themselves to be engaged decisively -- and while waiting out the inevitable withdrawal.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.politicalinsecurity.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/712

Leave a comment

About Me

Belisarius

This is my place to vent a little and get things off my chest. I am a retired Marine who has interests in WMDs. Since WMD events are, thankfully, few in number, I spend a lot of time reading about people likely to use them. This takes me on some interesting tangents. I travel alot in my post retirement career and do not always have time to comment as I post articles. Give me a day or two to catch up if I skip comments, please.

Email: belisarius =at= politicalinsecurity =dot= com

militarysignatures.com

Elsewhere


My Recommended Reading List


WMD Links


iAwareables

iAwareables.com

Military sites


Anti-terrorists

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

About this Entry