I have been busy with work, then moving to a new home, getting really sick, having an MRI and other tests, finishing the move, finally getting cable again, and then dealing with finishing moving while still being sick. I am surviving. Following the news was still easy, Commenting or posting was more difficult due to the lack of internet. Going to the McCafe for WiFi was ok, but not something I recommend for posts.
Things are returning to normal and I hope to start posting more soon. If there is something you would like an opinion about just let me know.
Thanks to those who have written to ask about where I have been. Here are some things to read.
'Power' move by male students ruffles U. of C.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-u-of-c-mens-groupmay19,0,4707353.story
Jessica Pan, president of Women in Business and a fourth-year student, questioned whether Men in Power's goals were being met by existing student groups.
"I'm not sure we really need another student organization that focuses on pre-professional development for men," Pan said, noting that, in just the area of business, there were five or six students groups that were gender-neutral.
Similarly, Ali Feenstra, a third-year student and a member of the Feminist Majority, questioned Men in Power's utility.
"It's like starting 'white men in business' -- there's not really any purpose," she said.
So, let me get this straight. There are five or six students groups that provide aid for all genders, so there is not a need for a group that concentrates on males - but there is a need for many groups that concentrate on promoting women.
This is so stupid that only a liberal could produce "logic" like this.
I am glad this group exists. Either more groups need to exist like this or fewer other biased groups. Like the feminists say, there are plenty of gender neutral groups. Or are they saying that women are so weak and lame that they need to be given extra help to survive in the world?
Countering the Military's Latest Fad: Counterinsurgency
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-u-of-c-mens-groupmay19,0,4707353.story
When Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates announced Monday that he was dismissing Gen. David McKiernan as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan and replacing him with Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, he signaled his support for an intellectual movement that in a few short years has come to dominate military thinking in Washington. Both McChrystal and his new No. 2, Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez, Gates emphasized, have a "unique skill set in counterinsurgency."
Counterinsurgency is king. Once the province of graduate students and historians of the conflicts in Vietnam and Algeria, this resurgent doctrine of how to wage a type of unconventional war has become the lens through which the American defense establishment analyzes what happened in Iraq, what to do now in Afghanistan, and the very future of warfare.
I have always felt that the army needs to concentrate on the large military issues while the Marines are the experts in counter-insurgency and small wars. It is true too! The Marines have always been the ones who fought in the small wars overseas while the Army provides the major power that can come behind and destroy or occupy things that the Marines can't handle.
The Army has always been jealous of the Marines. They have tried repeatedly to destroy them, and when that fails, they try to find reasons to marginalize them. They are so jealous that they constantly form elite units to emulate the Marines, like the Rangers.
It will never end that the Marines are the envy of the Army. That is why the Army is going to abandon its primary job and try to be the Marines. Then they can finally get rid of the competition.
Insurgents continue white phosphorus attacks
http://www.centcom.mil/en/press-releases/insurgents-continue-white-phosphorus-attacks.html
BAGRAM, Afghanistan (May 19, 2009) - Today, militants continued to attack International Security Assistance Force personnel using white phosphorus munitions.
In Gayan District, Paktika province, insurgents mortared an ISAF combat outpost with white phosphorus and high explosive rounds. No injuries or damage were reported.
This past week, two other cases of enemy white phosphorus use have been recorded in Regional Command-East, following the 11 May release of 38 declassified instances of insurgent white phosphorus access and misuse against personnel.
On May 16, ISAF troops in Bamiyan discovered a large cache of various ordnance, including nine 82mm white phosphorus mortar rounds. The rounds, which were photographed as evidence, were collected for destruction.
I remember not too many months ago when the Muslims and the Peaceniks all decried the legal use of WP to legally destroy Hamas government buildings that had been cleared of people. Just because people might have tried to sneak back and been hurt. Now, these same Muslims are using this weapon illegally to attack Israel and now NATO forces.
Where is the outcry from the Left about the illegal use of these weapons? Where do the terrorists get access to military grade mortar rounds?
Terrorism is outside of the Laws of War, Using WP against live targets is outside the Laws of War. Is that why they are allowed to use it this way? While Western forces are not?
Nowhere to turn - The shifting trends of suicide attacks
http://www.janes.com/news/security/jir/jir090528_1_n.shtml
The University of Chicago professor was largely correct in this assertion. However, since 2005 the use of suicide attacks has expanded considerably, and the motivations for the tactics have diversified.
Therefore, while Pape's thesis remains broadly accurate, the use of suicide tactics has changed over the years. As data from Jane's Terrorism and Insurgency Centre (JTIC) since 1998 demonstrates, religious ideological motivations have become more common as opposed to political nationalist motivations and non-democratic states have also been targeted.
Learning about the tactics of the the terrorists is always important for those who wish to counter them. Since it appears that suicide attacks are becoming more common, because it has been proven many times that conventional attacks can not beat a well trained military, we must learn more about how to identify and stop this threat before it kills too many more people.
Check out places like:
http://www.iacsp.com/
http://www.serviammagazine.com/
http://www.smgicorp.com/
http://www.atabonline.org/joomla/index.php
http://www.homelandsecurityssi.com/