Mexico: You Can't Make This Stuff Up

| No Comments

http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/mexico/articles/20090216.aspx

February 14, 2009: For the past three months Mexican and U.S. security officials have openly discussed increased U.S. support for Mexico in its war against drug gangs. This is being called, "the Cartel War". The U.S. is concerned about "spill-over" violence. Politicians in El Paso, Texas, are worried about it, and they are concerned for their Mexican neighbors in Ciudad, Juarez (Chihuahua state). Both Mexico and the U.S. are pushing "intelligence sharing" (intel on smuggling, drug gangs, weapons, finances, etc). One criticism from some sectors in Mexico is that intel sharing will likely lead to "American contractors" (meaning military or intelligence service companies). This is "contractors" used in a very negative sense, suggesting American mercenaries. Apparently the Mexican government thinks hiring expertise to support Mexican operations is a good option. Are joint operations by the U.S. and Mexico possible? Sure - but as both the U.S. government and Mexican government have stressed, such operations have to be very carefully planned and approved by both governments. At the moment Mexican-U.S. joint military operations are very unlikely, but it is a good bet that planning officers in Mexico and the U.S. are looking at "what can we do for each other" if cartels launch attacks in the U.S., or tried to create a situation where Mexican military units cross the border in the midst of a combat operation. Some joint operations well short of combat and "increased security presence" operations make a lot of sense. Joint communications operations are one example, and "joint liaison teams" manned by experienced military personnel from both countries another. You can bet any joint team will operate on both sides of the border. Political cover is one reason - Mexicans are sensitive to "affronts to sovereignty." However, a "both sides" joint operation is also common sense since the violence and drug smuggling has transnational effects. Ad hoc arrangements and relationships already exist, but it appears both governments are interested in more formal and permanent cooperation.

Leave a comment

About Me

Belisarius

This is my place to vent a little and get things off my chest. I am a retired Marine who has interests in WMDs. Since WMD events are, thankfully, few in number, I spend a lot of time reading about people likely to use them. This takes me on some interesting tangents. I travel alot in my post retirement career and do not always have time to comment as I post articles. Give me a day or two to catch up if I skip comments, please.

Email: belisarius =at= politicalinsecurity =dot= com

militarysignatures.com

Elsewhere


My Recommended Reading List


WMD Links


iAwareables

iAwareables.com

Military sites


Anti-terrorists

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Belisarius published on February 18, 2009 6:45 PM.

Rancher cleared in rights case was the previous entry in this blog.

Holder Calls U.S. 'Nation of Cowards' on Race Matters is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.